René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> wrote: > Am 29.06.21 um 22:53 schrieb Eric Wong: > > With many alternates, the duplicate check in alt_odb_usable() > > wastes many cycles doing repeated fspathcmp() on every existing > > alternate. Use a khash to speed up lookups by odb->path. > > > > Since the kh_put_* API uses the supplied key without > > duplicating it, we also take advantage of it to replace both > > xstrdup() and strbuf_release() in link_alt_odb_entry() with > > strbuf_detach() to avoid the allocation and copy. > > > > In a test repository with 50K alternates and each of those 50K > > alternates having one alternate each (for a total of 100K total > > alternates); this speeds up lookup of a non-existent blob from > > over 16 minutes to roughly 2.7 seconds on my busy workstation. > > Yay for hashmaps! :) > > > Note: all underlying git object directories were small and > > unpacked with only loose objects and no packs. Having to load > > packs increases times significantly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > object-file.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > object-store.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > > object.c | 2 ++ > > 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/object-file.c b/object-file.c > > index f233b440b2..304af3a172 100644 > > --- a/object-file.c > > +++ b/object-file.c > > @@ -517,9 +517,9 @@ const char *loose_object_path(struct repository *r, struct strbuf *buf, > > */ > > static int alt_odb_usable(struct raw_object_store *o, > > struct strbuf *path, > > - const char *normalized_objdir) > > + const char *normalized_objdir, khiter_t *pos) > > { > > - struct object_directory *odb; > > + int r; > > > > /* Detect cases where alternate disappeared */ > > if (!is_directory(path->buf)) { > > @@ -533,14 +533,22 @@ static int alt_odb_usable(struct raw_object_store *o, > > * Prevent the common mistake of listing the same > > * thing twice, or object directory itself. > > */ > > - for (odb = o->odb; odb; odb = odb->next) { > > - if (!fspathcmp(path->buf, odb->path)) > > - return 0; > > + if (!o->odb_by_path) { > > + khiter_t p; > > + > > + o->odb_by_path = kh_init_odb_path_map(); > > + assert(!o->odb->next); > > + p = kh_put_odb_path_map(o->odb_by_path, o->odb->path, &r); > > So on the first run you not just create the hashmap, but you also > pre-populate it with the main object directory. Makes sense. The > hashmap wouldn't even be created in repositories without alternates. > > > + if (r < 0) die_errno(_("kh_put_odb_path_map")); > > Our other callers don't handle a negative return code because it would > indicate an allocation failure, and in our version we use ALLOC_ARRAY, > which dies on error. So you don't need that check here, but we better > clarify that in khash.h. > > > + assert(r == 1); /* never used */ > > + kh_value(o->odb_by_path, p) = o->odb; > > } > > if (!fspathcmp(path->buf, normalized_objdir)) > > return 0; > > - > > - return 1; > > + *pos = kh_put_odb_path_map(o->odb_by_path, path->buf, &r); > > + if (r < 0) die_errno(_("kh_put_odb_path_map")); > > Dito. > > > + /* r: 0 = exists, 1 = never used, 2 = deleted */ > > + return r == 0 ? 0 : 1; > > The comment indicates that khash would be nicer to use if it had an > enum for the kh_put return values. Perhaps, but that should be done in > another series. Agreed for another series. I've also found myself wishing khash used enums. But I'm also not sure how much changing of 3rd party code we should be doing... > I like the solution in oidset.c to make this more readable, though: Call > the return value "added" instead of "r" and then a "return !added;" > makes sense without additional comments. > > > } > > > > /* > > diff --git a/object-store.h b/object-store.h > > index ec32c23dcb..20c1cedb75 100644 > > --- a/object-store.h > > +++ b/object-store.h > > @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ > > #include "oid-array.h" > > #include "strbuf.h" > > #include "thread-utils.h" > > +#include "khash.h" > > +#include "dir.h" > > > > struct object_directory { > > struct object_directory *next; > > @@ -30,6 +32,19 @@ struct object_directory { > > char *path; > > }; > > > > +static inline int odb_path_eq(const char *a, const char *b) > > +{ > > + return !fspathcmp(a, b); > > +} > > This is not specific to the object store. It could be called fspatheq > and live in dir.h. Or dir.c -- a surprising amount of code seems to > necessary for that negation (https://godbolt.org/z/MY7Wda3a7). Anyway, > it's just an idea for another series. No JS here for godbolt, but there's also a bunch of "!fspathcmp" here that could probably be changed to fspatheq. > > + > > +static inline int odb_path_hash(const char *str) > > +{ > > + return ignore_case ? strihash(str) : __ac_X31_hash_string(str); > > +} > > The internal Attractive Chaos (__ac_*) macros should be left confined > to khash.h, I think. Its alias kh_str_hash_func would be better > suited here. > > Do we want to use the K&R hash function here at all, though? If we > use FNV-1 when ignoring case, why not also use it (i.e. strhash) when > respecting it? At least that's done in builtin/sparse-checkout.c, > dir.c and merge-recursive.c. This is just handwaving and yammering > about lack of symmetry, but I do wonder how your performance numbers > look with strhash. If it's fine then we could package this up as > fspathhash.. Yeah, I think fspathhash should be path_hash in merge-recursive.c (and path_hash eliminated). I don't have performance numbers, and I doubt hash function performance is much overhead, here. I used X31 since it was local to khash. I would prefer we only have one non-cryptographic hash implementation to reduce cognitive overhead, so maybe we can drop X31 entirely for FNV-1. I'd also prefer we only have khash or hashmap, not both. > And I also wonder how it looks if you use strihash unconditionally. > I guess case collisions are usually rare and branching based on a > global variable may be more expensive than case folding. *shrug* I'll let somebody with more appropriate systems do benchmarks, there. But it could be an easy switch once fspathhash is in place.