Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:04 AM Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > So this corresponds to the bottommost step in the series that is >> > queued as hn/reftable, with the difference at the end of this >> > message. >> > >> > Do you want me to replace that single step with this version and >> > rebuild the remainder of the topic on top? >> >> Yes. >> >> I'm hoping this can graduate soon, so the hn/reftable topic becomes >> smaller (I don't know what that means for your organization of the >> seen branch). > > Any update on this? This wasn't queued for next, but I believe it should be. Sorry, I thought you meant you wanted to fix up the bottommost commit in that series, which I think was already done at 617480d7 (refs: make explicit that ref_iterator_peel returns boolean, 2021-05-19), and did not realize that you wanted a separate single patch topic for this step, on top of which the remainder of the other topic builds. Will do. Thanks.
