martin wrote: > On 02/07/2021 12:17, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > Andreas Schwab wrote: > >> On Jul 02 2021, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >>> +ALIAS > >>> +~~~~~ > >>> +'git co' > >> That's `checkout' in hg, bzr, svn and cvs. > > I know, and commit is ci in many of them. > > > > The reason why I decided to make checkout co, is that we have already an > > alternative for checkout: switch. So unlike all those other VCS, in git > > we can have: > > > > co = commit > > sw = switch > > > > If I may jump into the discussion. > > IMHO it would be good to (partly) follow other vcs, and have > commit = ci I'm fine with leaving co out of the default aliases if it's deemed "too controversial". But ci doesn't make sense. ci comes from "check in" which has no similitude in git. I don't think it's a good idea to leave "git checkout" without an alias (it's perhaps the second or third most used command), but at least some aliases are better than no aliases. > 3) if co is not a default, then people can set it according to their own > taste, with less confusion, than if they override a default. People already have aliases. Whatever is the default doesn't matter. If you don't like the default you can set a co alias to whatever you want. -- Felipe Contreras
