Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Jul 02 2021, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > > Andreas Schwab wrote: > >> On Jul 02 2021, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> > >> > diff --git a/Documentation/git-commit.txt b/Documentation/git-commit.txt > >> > index 340c5fbb48..32b1fdba45 100644 > >> > --- a/Documentation/git-commit.txt > >> > +++ b/Documentation/git-commit.txt > >> > @@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ SYNOPSIS > >> > [(--trailer <token>[(=|:)<value>])...] [-S[<keyid>]] > >> > [--] [<pathspec>...] > >> > > >> > +ALIAS > >> > +~~~~~ > >> > +'git co' > >> > >> That's `checkout' in hg, bzr, svn and cvs. > > > > I know, and commit is ci in many of them. > > What's the point of making git different if the goal is to make it > similar? The goal is not to make git identical to every other SCM; it's to take the best ideas (not all of them). > Everyone will associate co with checkout. I don't think so. Fortunately there's other people in the mailing list that can opine. -- Felipe Contreras
