On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 09:39:26AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > I do not see a point in complicating the build procedure to avoid > > using it. > > I'd really understand your and Jeff's concerns if I was proposing some > really complex workaround, but it's just extending & making consistent > the "mv" dance we already use for 1/2 our rules already. Just to clarify my position: I'm not all that upset about adding more uses of "mv", as I agree it's not a lot of code (and in general I like making things atomic). Mostly I was trying to understand your use case, and whether we could be encouraging a more robust workflow there. And that's what I was prodding at in the last email: what's the reason that doing it in a separate workdir doesn't work? I did find your answers compelling that it takes more disk space, and you have to compile everything twice (I do use ccache myself, but I agree that "oh, just install ccache" is not helpful advice in the general case). -Peff
