Re: [PATCH] Add a new lstat and fstat implementation based on Win32 API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
Hi,

On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote:

Marius Storm-Olsen schrieb:
Marius Storm-Olsen said the following on 04.09.2007 13:53:
In the meantime, I've pushed out a new patch
http://repo.or.cz/w/git/mingw/4msysgit.git?a=commitdiff;h=683775c00d9fb95bcbe4632f95b67a96b902fa59
/me starts another test run, to see how our tests are doing now..
Neat, with the custom stat() changes cherry-picked on top of 4msysgit.git
'devel' branch, I only have one failing testcase
    t6024-recursive-merge.sh
when running
    $ NO_SYMLINKS=1 make -k

The rest are passing with flying colors!
And that one will eventually pass if only you try it often enough. See
71ee4210c in mingw.git.

Do you have Linus' patch applied? The one where the config is read at the start of write-tree?

The problem only occurred since we have core.crlf = input unilaterally now.

Yes, I have that patch, but I don't have core.crlf set.

There are a lot of tests that do a series of commits in a row, with file changes such that the file size does _not_ change, aka "racy git" problem. This problem is obviously not 100% fixed on MSys: We do not correctly detect that there are files that might be modified ("racily clean" files). Some tests are prone to trigger the bug, others not.

-- Hannes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux