Re: [PATCH 2/2] pull: improve default warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:55 PM Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Alex Henrie wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:19 PM Felipe Contreras
> > <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Similarly, until "git pull" does something sensible by default (which
> > > isn't the case now), these debates will continue, and there's value in
> > > them.
> >
> > At this point, I'm inclined to push for s/advise/die/ in pull.c in the
> > next release, without a transitional period, just to end the argument
> > over how to best explain the current awkward situation. (I'm sure
> > there will be more arguments after that, but hopefully they won't be
> > as tiresome.)
>
> Give it a try. You will inevitably stumble upon all the problems I
> already fixed.

Patch sent.

> In the meantime what's the problem with v2?

I think that setting pull.rebase on a per-repository basis (instead of
globally or per-invocation) makes for the easiest workflow in the
majority of cases, so I would prefer to continue to recommend that to
users primarily, but I don't have a strong opinion.

-Alex



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux