Re: Windows: core.useBuiltinFSMonitor without core.untrackedcache - performance hazard?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jeff,

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 8:41 PM Jeff Hostetler <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We're currently looking at a problem that we believe is in the
> untracked-cache code.  This is causing some of our Scalar tests
> to fail on Windows when the untracked-cache is turned on.  This
> is independent of whether FSMonitor or FSCache is turned on.
> We're still tracking this down.
>
> And yes, the best possible solution is to turn on FSMonitor *and*
> the untracked-cache, so that the "untracked" status code doesn't
> have to do anything.  So I want to look at tracking down the above
> problem before doing anything else.

I got a bit excited about a possible clean path forward to getting
-uall to work well with untracked cache, and submitted a patch along
those lines, but rereading the above I should probably have been a
little more patient.

Is there anything "we" can do to see/understand the
scalar-test-suite-error you describe above, or is this
microsoft-internal?

Thanks
Tao



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux