Taylor Blau wrote: > I do think that .DELETE_ON_ERROR is less robust when running "make" in > one terminal and inspecting the result in another, but I'm also not sure > how much we should be concerned about that. On the other hand, we lose > a nice property of our existing Makefile which is that you can always > run ./git and get a working binary. The new state is that you might see > a half-written binary. How would that happen? First, the git target isn't changed, and second, gcc (and presumably other compilers/linkers) wouldn't write the binary if interrupted. -- Felipe Contreras
