Re: [PATCH] doc: warn people against --max-pack-size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 04:15:23PM +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:

> > I'm not quite sure what you're asking. If you mean: should we tell
> > people that they can't use "4.9m" and should instead use "5017k"
> > instead, then I don't have a strong opinion.
> 
> Sorry, I should have included an example based on the patch
> 
> > +The minimum size allowed is limited to 1 MiB. The default is unlimited.
> > +Common unit suffixes of 'k', 'm', or 'g' are supported.
> 
> e.g.
> 
> +The default is unlimited. Common unit suffixes of 'k', 'm', or 'g' are
> +supported. The minimum size allowed is limited to 1 MiB (`1024k`). 
> 
> I swapped the sentence order to allow the scaled example of the minimum
> to be after the explanation of the suffixes

Ah, I see. I don't have a strong feeling either way if you want to
prepare a patch.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux