Using .gitignore symbolic links?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The recent release candidate of Git (v2.32.0) hit my OS this week, and it included a line () on symbolic links for several specific files are now ignored.

Thank you for putting the changelogs in an accessible location, knowing that this was a known breaking change was useful in debugging why my workflows stopped working.

I have two concerns.

First, the error thrown is

> "warning: unable to access '.gitignore': Too many levels of symbolic links",

,,,which does not accurately represent what is happening.

I spent a bit of time convinced that I'd broken something with the symbolic links during setup, and an error such as "symbolic linking no longer allowed for 'filename'." would make more sense, given the change under discussion eliminates *any* use of symbolic links.


Secondly, and more personally important to me, a system administrator:
My repositories use symbolic links to allow a single .gitignore file to define my folder structure, allowing me to avoid hardcoding the repo-specific folder paths into my configs.

Is there a flag to disable this new behavior?

If not, this change means I need to update dozens of files, duplicates all, or completely rewrite my .gitignore files to have shyteloads of arbitrary file paths in them, which I'd rather not do.

Also, is there a justification for forcing this as the on-update default new behavior, when a user-querying behavior (such as with 'git pull' defaults as they've changed recently) exists?

---

ref https://github.com/git/git/commit/142430338477d9d1bb25be66267225fb58498d92#diff-eae5facd145e2748250f7b275e45cb001c0b8e2c47c529a4e28bbfa208e5fb59R7


===


Thoughts?

--
Tessa L. H. Lovelace
----
office:		503.893.9709
consulting:	assorted.tech




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux