Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > I'm suggesting that 5% of their time would be better spent on something > that clearly has direct applicability to the maintenance of existing > code and documentation, and the authoring of new works. I also think it > happens to gives you 100% of the end result you want in terms of what > code/docs we end up with in-tree. Agreed, but what about *our* time? I feel like we already have spent more than ten times the amount of time this non-issue warranted. Can we return to do something actually productive? I vote for a moratorium on this issue. Can we leave this as it is and return back to it in a month or so? -- Felipe Contreras
