Re: [PATCH] Add a new lstat and fstat implementation based on Win32 API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> > I saw some funny stuff on Windows, like test cases succeeding when run
> > interactively, but failing when run from "make test".
> 
> That's very likely the issue that we work around by inserting "sleep 1" at
> strategic points, which is a timing (race condition) issue and does not
> depend on interactive vs. "make test".

Makes sense to me now.  Especially around t5510 -- t5701 I see those (and 
I do not run "make test" often, since it takes _ages_.

Thanks,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux