Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年6月17日周四 下午3:16写道：
>
> > The raw data of blob, tree objects may contain '\0', but most of
> > the logic in `ref-filter` depends on the output of the atom being
> > text (specifically, no embedded NULs in it).
> >
> > E.g. `quote_formatting()` use `strbuf_addstr()` or `*._quote_buf()`
> > add the data to the buffer. The raw data of a tree object is
> > `100644 one\0...`, only the `100644 one` will be added to the buffer,
> > which is incorrect.
> >
> > Therefore, add a new member in `struct atom_value`: `s_size`, which
> > can record raw object size, it can help us add raw object data to
> > the buffer or compare two buffers which contain raw object data.
>
> Most of the functions that deal with this already use a strbuf in some
> way, before we had a const char *, now there's a size_t to go along with
> it, why not simply use a strbuf in the struct for the data? You'll then
> get the size and \0 handling for free, and any functions to deal with
> conversion can stick to the strbuf API, there seems to be a lot of back
> and forth now.
>
Yes, strbuf is a suitable choice when using <str,len> pair.
But if replace v->s with strbuf, the possible changes will be larger.
> > Beyond, `--format=%(raw)` cannot be used with `--python`, `--shell`,
> > `--tcl`, `--perl` because if our binary raw data is passed to a variable
> > in the host language, the host language may not support arbitrary binary
> > data in the variables of its string type.
>
> Perl at least deals with that just fine, and to the extent that it
> doesn't any new problems here would have nothing to do with \0 being in
> the data. Perl doesn't have a notion of "binary has \0 in it", it always
> supports \0, it has a notion of "is it utf-8 or not?", so any encoding
> problems wouldn't be new. I'd think that the same would be true of
> Python, but I'm not sure.
>
Not python safe. See [1].
Regarding the perl language, I support Junio's point of view: it can be
re-supported in the future.
>
> > +test_expect_success 'basic atom: refs/tags/testtag *raw' '
> > + git cat-file commit refs/tags/testtag^{} >expected &&
> > + git for-each-ref --format="%(*raw)" refs/tags/testtag >actual &&
> > + sanitize_pgp <expected >expected.clean &&
> > + sanitize_pgp <actual >actual.clean &&
> > + echo "" >>expected.clean &&
>
> Just "echo" will do, ditto for the rest. Also odd to go back and forth
> between populating expected.clean & actual.clean.
>
Are you saying that sanitize_pgp is not needed?
>
> > +test_expect_success 'set up refs pointing to binary blob' '
> > + printf "a\0b\0c" >blob1 &&
> > + printf "a\0c\0b" >blob2 &&
> > + printf "\0a\0b\0c" >blob3 &&
> > + printf "abc" >blob4 &&
> > + printf "\0 \0 \0 " >blob5 &&
> > + printf "\0 \0a\0 " >blob6 &&
> > + printf " " >blob7 &&
> > + >blob8 &&
> > + git hash-object blob1 -w | xargs git update-ref refs/myblobs/blob1 &&
> > + git hash-object blob2 -w | xargs git update-ref refs/myblobs/blob2 &&
> > + git hash-object blob3 -w | xargs git update-ref refs/myblobs/blob3 &&
> > + git hash-object blob4 -w | xargs git update-ref refs/myblobs/blob4 &&
> > + git hash-object blob5 -w | xargs git update-ref refs/myblobs/blob5 &&
> > + git hash-object blob6 -w | xargs git update-ref refs/myblobs/blob6 &&
> > + git hash-object blob7 -w | xargs git update-ref refs/myblobs/blob7 &&
> > + git hash-object blob8 -w | xargs git update-ref refs/myblobs/blob8
>
> Hrm, xargs just to avoid:
>
> git update-ref ... $(git hash-object) ?
>
I didn’t think about it, just for convenience.
> > +test_expect_success '%(raw) with --python must failed' '
> > + test_must_fail git for-each-ref --format="%(raw)" --python
> > +'
> > +
> > +test_expect_success '%(raw) with --tcl must failed' '
> > + test_must_fail git for-each-ref --format="%(raw)" --tcl
> > +'
> > +
> > +test_expect_success '%(raw) with --perl must failed' '
> > + test_must_fail git for-each-ref --format="%(raw)" --perl
> > +'
> > +
> > +test_expect_success '%(raw) with --shell must failed' '
> > + test_must_fail git for-each-ref --format="%(raw)" --shell
> > +'
> > +
> > +test_expect_success '%(raw) with --shell and --sort=raw must failed' '
> > + test_must_fail git for-each-ref --format="%(raw)" --sort=raw --shell
> > +'
>
> s/must failed/must fail/, but see question above about encoding in these
> languages...
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAOLTT8QR_GRm4TYk0E_eazQ+unVQODc-3L+b4V5JUN5jtZR8uA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Thanks for a review.
--
ZheNing Hu
