Re: [PATCH 0/6] doc: replace "alice" and "bob" examples

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 05:30:14AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > > I suggested in [1] that the "alice" and "bob" examples in our
> > > documentation would be better written without a reference to such
> > > fictional characters, for reasons that have nothing to do with trying
> > > to bend over backwards to avoid any reference to people's gender. It
> > > just makes for better documentation.
> >
> > I actually do not mind cast of characters with concrete names,
> > especially when there are more than three parties involved and
> > having names for them help clarify the description.  But I agree
> > with you that Alice and Bob should be reserved for situations where
> > appearance of Eve would reasonably be anticipated, or the use of
> > these two names become distracting to those who happen to be aware
> > how these characters are often used in CS literature.
> >
> > Perhaps s/Alice/Tabby/ and s/Bob/Fido/ or something like that ;-)?
> 
>   i look forward to the renaming of "git" to something more innocuous
> and palatable because, somewhere, someone could conceivably,
> hypothetically, theoretically take exception to it.
> 
>   seriously, can we start a second mailing list where people want to
> talk about, you know, version control?

Can you please tone down your responses a bit?

One of the points under discussion here is whether those names end up
being confusing to users because of their use in other places (like
cryptographic examples). And I think the comprehensibility of our
documentation is quite relevant to the project.

But even if this were done purely for reasons of gender-neutrality, I
still think your response is inappropriate. You are quite welcome to
argue against such a change, but snarky or dismissive responses aren't
welcome.

(I'm referring to the last paragraph of your other response in this
thread, too. I did find the wikipedia link you sent earlier helpful to
the discussion, and personally I don't find the names confusing at all,
for the reasons it mentioned. But that may not be universal).

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux