Johannes Schindelin said the following on 03.09.2007 13:39:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Marius Storm-Olsen wrote:Robin Rosenberg said the following on 02.09.2007 22:27:It does now: See http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa363866.aspxYeah, I know about Vista's improved support for symbolic links. However, I think we can let that lay for a while, until we decide to make Git generate proper symlinks on Vista. I don't see it as a 1st priority at the moment, and we can always add the needed functionality in a separate stat() function later.... and force everybody to upgrade to Vista, thereby working for Microsoft for free? You _know_ that I will oppose that change.
;-) I wouldn't dream of it!Nah, my comment was more 'allow usage of proper Symlinks on Vista' at a later point. I would still argue that the default would be what we have today. So, it would have to be an option. But seeing what they've done to the symlinks there, it might be far fetched. We'll worry about that (much) later..
-- .marius
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
