Derrick Stolee wrote: > On 6/11/2021 4:28 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > We generally avoid specifying the gender of our users in order to be > > more politically correct, but sometimes due to lack of time and/or > > creativity a few slip by. > > s/politically correct/inclusive/ I don't believe avoiding pronouns makes us more inclusive, and I've yet to see an example where any person would feel personally excluded from. > Instead of "lack of time and/or creativity" perhaps be more > generous to our fellow contributors and instead say... I believe my wording is more generous because it implies they tried, whereas yours implies they didn't even try. > but sometimes a few slip by due to habit. > > > @@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ int parse_expiry_date(const char *date, timestamp_t *timestamp) > > /* > > * We take over "now" here, which usually translates > > * to the current timestamp. This is because the user > > - * really means to expire everything she has done in > > + * really means to expire everything that has been done in > > nit: s/has been/was/ > > We can be a little more active here. True. That's probably better. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras
