Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > This is going to sound harsh, but people shouldn't waste (any more) > time reviewing the patches in this thread or the "merge: cleanups and > fix" series submitted elsewhere. They should all just be rejected. > > I do not think it is reasonable to expect reviewers to spend time > responding to re-posted patches when: > * no attempt was made to make sure they were up-to-date with current > code beyond compiling (see below) > * no attempt was made to address missing items pointed out in > response to the original submission[1] > * no attempt was made to handle or even test particular cases > pointed out in response to the original submission (see [1] and below) > * the patches were posted despite knowing they caused segfaults, and > without even stating as much![2] > * the segfault "fixes" are submitted as a separate series from the > patch introducing the segfault[3], raising the risk that one gets > picked up without the other. Fair enough. Thanks.
