Some people have a problem with using a female reviewer or a female developer as an example, and since this is an irrelevant detail, let's say goodbye to our illustrative female colleagues. Inspired-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 5 ++--- Documentation/git-push.txt | 4 ++-- Documentation/user-manual.txt | 2 +- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches index 55287d72e0..3e215f4d80 100644 --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches @@ -373,9 +373,8 @@ If you like, you can put extra tags at the end: . `Acked-by:` says that the person who is more familiar with the area the patch attempts to modify liked the patch. . `Reviewed-by:`, unlike the other tags, can only be offered by the - reviewer and means that she is completely satisfied that the patch - is ready for application. It is usually offered only after a - detailed review. + reviewers themselves when they are completely satisfied with the + patch after a detailed analysis. . `Tested-by:` is used to indicate that the person applied the patch and found it to have the desired effect. diff --git a/Documentation/git-push.txt b/Documentation/git-push.txt index a953c7c387..2f25aa3a29 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-push.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-push.txt @@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ Imagine that you have to rebase what you have already published. You will have to bypass the "must fast-forward" rule in order to replace the history you originally published with the rebased history. If somebody else built on top of your original history while you are -rebasing, the tip of the branch at the remote may advance with her -commit, and blindly pushing with `--force` will lose her work. +rebasing, the tip of the branch at the remote may advance with their +commit, and blindly pushing with `--force` will lose their work. + This option allows you to say that you expect the history you are updating is what you rebased and want to replace. If the remote ref diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.txt b/Documentation/user-manual.txt index f9e54b8674..96240598e3 100644 --- a/Documentation/user-manual.txt +++ b/Documentation/user-manual.txt @@ -2792,7 +2792,7 @@ A fast-forward looks something like this: In some cases it is possible that the new head will *not* actually be a descendant of the old head. For example, the developer may have -realized she made a serious mistake, and decided to backtrack, +realized a serious mistake was made and decided to backtrack, resulting in a situation like: ................................................ -- 2.32.0
