Re: [PATCH] add_pending_object_with_path(): work around "gcc -O3" complaint

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 09:06:44AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> We can work around this by replacing our "did we hit the trailing NUL"
> subscript dereference with a length check. We do not even have to pay
> the cost for an extra strlen(), as we can pass our new length into
> interpret_branch_name(), which was converting our "0" into a call to
> strlen() anyway.
> [...]
> -		if (0 < len && name[len] && buf.len)
> +		if (0 < len && len < namelen && buf.len)
>  			strbuf_addstr(&buf, name + len);

I guess another option would be to drop the check entirely. It is only
protecting us from calling strbuf_addstr() with an empty string, which
is a noop anyway (it would not even cause a useless allocation, since we
know that buf is non-empty, and that it won't need to grow).

I think I still prefer my original solution, though.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux