Re: [PATCH 4/8] refs: make errno output explicit for refs_resolve_ref_unsafe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 4:51 AM Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This introduces refs_resolve_ref_unsafe_with_errno(), which makes the API
> > contract for the errno output explicit. The implementation still relies on
> > the global errno variable to ensure no side effects.
>
> Looking at the next few patches, I think the plan is:
>
>  - Introduce a new function refs_resolve_ref_unsafe_with_errno() which
>    returns the error information in an out param instead of errno. Right
>    now, it wraps refs_resolve_ref_unsafe().
>  - Migrate all callers that require the error information to
>    refs_resolve_ref_unsafe_with_errno(), and leave all callers that do
>    not require the error information alone (that is, using
>    refs_resolve_ref_unsafe()).
>  - To ensure that all callers using refs_resolve_ref_unsafe() really do
>    not use errno, set it to 0. (This is allowed by the errno contract -
>    successes can set errno to whatever they want.)
>
> If this is the plan, it should be written in the commit message.

I added more description to the commit message.

> As it is, this patch handles the first and maybe part of the second
> step, and patch 5 handles the rest of the second step? I think the
> patches should be more clearly divided.

Done.

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich
I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays.
--

Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich

Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg

Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux