Re: [PATCH 0/4] [GSOC][RFC] ref-filter: add %(rest) atom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年6月9日周三 上午11:39写道:
>
> "ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > In order to let git cat-file --batch reuse ref-filter logic, in this
> > version, the atom %(rest) is added to ref-filter.
> >
> > Change from last version:
> >
> >  1. Deleted two commit about %(raw:textconv) and %(raw:filters), their
> >     construction will be after letting cat-file --batch uses ref-filter
> >     logic.
> >  2. Exchange the order of the definition of "cmp_fn" and the declaration of
> >     "a_size" and "b_size" in cmp_ref_sorting(), to avoid breaking
> >     -Wdecl-after-stmt.
> >  3. Delete --rest option, "git for-each-ref" family will reject %(rest) by
> >     default.
> >  4. Add GPG prefix to some %(raw) tests.
> >
> > ZheNing Hu (4):
> >   [GSOC] ref-filter: add obj-type check in grab contents
> >   [GSOC] ref-filter: add %(raw) atom
> >   [GSOC] ref-filter: use non-const ref_format in *_atom_parser()
> >   [GSOC] ref-filter: add %(rest) atom
>
> Thanks, will replace.

It’s worth mentioning that this patch still fails the github CI test. [1]

t6300-for-each-ref.sh:
274: Verify sorts with raw
275: Verify sorts with raw:size
278: empty raw refs with %(if)

There is no such breakage on my local machine.

[1] https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/976/checks?check_run_id=2774963705




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux