Re: [PATCH v5 02/14] sparse-index: include EXTENDED flag when expanding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 5:34 AM Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
<gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When creating a full index from a sparse one, we create cache entries
> for every blob within a given sparse directory entry. These are
> correctly marked with the CE_SKIP_WORKTREE flag, but they must also be
> marked with the CE_EXTENDED flag to ensure that the skip-worktree bit is
> correctly written to disk in the case that the index is not converted
> back down to a sparse-index.

In our previous discussion on this patch from v3
(https://lore.kernel.org/git/cb9161ca-dc6e-b77b-1a41-385ed8920bb2@xxxxxxxxx/),
you said you'd explain the reason for this change in a bit more
detail, but the commit message has not changed.

Could this be corrected?

>
> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  sparse-index.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sparse-index.c b/sparse-index.c
> index 1b49898d0cb7..b2b3fbd75050 100644
> --- a/sparse-index.c
> +++ b/sparse-index.c
> @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static int add_path_to_index(const struct object_id *oid,
>         strbuf_addstr(base, path);
>
>         ce = make_cache_entry(istate, mode, oid, base->buf, 0, 0);
> -       ce->ce_flags |= CE_SKIP_WORKTREE;
> +       ce->ce_flags |= CE_SKIP_WORKTREE | CE_EXTENDED;
>         set_index_entry(istate, istate->cache_nr++, ce);
>
>         strbuf_setlen(base, len);
> --
> gitgitgadget



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux