Re: Large-scale configuration backup with GIT?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I'm just thinking about storing our whole company's configuration into
> GIT, because I'm all too used to it. That is, there are configuration
> ...
> In both cases, I'd be left with a good number of GIT repos, which
> should probably be bound together with the GIT subproject functions.
> However, one really interesting thing would be to be able to get the
> diff of two machine's configuration files. (Think of machines that
> *should* be all identical!)  For this, it probably would be easier to
> not put each machine into its own GIT repo, but to use a single one
> with a zillion branches, one for each machine.
>
> Did anybody already try to do something like that and can help me with
> some real-life experience on that topic?

This is something similar to what I and others in my group did
long time before git was even invented.  I'd suggest you go in
the opposite direction.

If you have 5 configurations, each of which have 20 machines
that _should_ share that configuration (modulo obvious
differences that come from hostname, IP address assignment,
etc), then

 - You keep track of 5 configurations; in git, you would
   probably maintain them as 5 branches.

 - You have a build mechanism to create systemic variation among
   20 machines that shares one configuration; this can be
   different per branch.  So if you have 20 solaris machines all
   should share logically the same configuration, you would:

	$ git checkout solarisconf

        ... tweak the config for machine #27, adjusting for
        ... hostname, IP address variation, etc...
        $ make target=solaris27 output=../solaris27.expect

   Make that makefile produce the output in named directory;

 - You get the config dump from your machines (your "staging
   area"), as you planned.  Then after running the above, you
   could:

	$ cd ..
        $ diff -r solaris27.expect solaris27.actual

   if your "staging area" for machine #27 is "solaris27.actual".

The difference you would see is something done by *hand* on the
machine, which you would want to propagate back to the solaris
configuration *source* you keep track in git.  For some changes,
you may even want to adjust that single manual change done on
machine #27 so that you do not have to do that on other 19
solaris boxes manually, by adjusting the build procedure in the
solarisconf branch.



 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux