Re: [PATCH 0/6] [GSOC][RFC] ref-filter: add %(raw:textconv) and %(raw:filters)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The current series is based on 0efed9435 ([GSOC] ref-filter: add %(raw)
> atom)

I do not have that commit object, but these six patches include the
two commits that are %(raw) and %(raw:size), so I'll just discard
the old round that wasn't based on the atom-type stuff and queue
these six as a single series.

As I already said, I am not sure how %(rest) makes any sense outside
the context of "cat-file --batch"; I suspect it would make more sense
to make it easier to arrange certain placeholders to error out when
used in a context where they do not make sense (e.g. use of --rest
in "git branch --list").




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux