On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 02:34:16PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> @@ -99,6 +94,11 @@ static int promisor_remote_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *data
> size_t namelen;
> const char *subkey;
>
> + if (!strcmp(var, "extensions.partialclone")) {
> + repository_format_partial_clone = xstrdup(value);
Can value ever be NULL here? I think the answer is "no, because we check
earlier in setup.c:handle_extension_v0()", but there is an implicit
conversion from xstrdup_or_null() to just xstrdup(), which would fault
if value were to be NULL.
Looking deeper, this path is a little confusing to me, since (in the
pre-image), handle_extension_v0() makes a copy of value and binds it to
data->partial_clone. But then check_repository_format_gently() makes
another copy of canidate->partial_clone (which is the same location as
data->partial_clone).
So, the extra copy is a little strange to me, because even though the
copy in handle_extension_v0() is definitely necessary, I'm not certain
that the one in set_repository_format_partial_clone() is. And this patch
removes the latter one, which I think is good. But we never free
repository_format_partial_clone.
Maybe that is added in a later patch, let's see...
Thanks,
Taylor
