Re: Request feature: –no-submodule

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> It doesn't seem outrageous to me for Git to automatically populate
> "pseudo-attributes" that connect properties of paths to the attribute
> system.

Sounds sensible.  The attribute assignment was designed to purely
depend on paths and not contents, so it might be a bit awkwarad to
implement, but it should be doable.

> An alternative view is allowing a pathspec that asks about the mode:
>
>   git ls-files ':(mode=160000)'
>
> That also lets you ask about other things, like:
>
>   git ls-files ':(mode=100755)'
>
> but it is probably unnecessarily arcane (even I had to look up the
> correct mode for a gitlink just now :) ).

The original request, as I understand the clarification posted
upthread, is not "submodules are uninteresting", but is "we want
regular files" (and we postprocess further the output), so such a
"mode" (pseudo-)attribute that is automatically populated would be a
better fit anyway.  With the current system, they can already do:

    git ls-files -s ':(exclude)*.png' ':(exclude)*.ico)' |
    sed -n -e 's/^100[76][54][54] [0-9a-f]* 0       //p' |
    xargs dos2unix

(cf. <9cc98ca3-bdc5-61bf-450a-99bb47673d6c@xxxxxxxxx>)

and with such an auto-pseudo-attribute, presumably something along
this line would work, removing the need for the intermediate filter:

    git ls-files \
	':(attr:mode=100755)' ':(attr:mode=100644)' \
	':(exclude)*.png' ':(exclude)*.ico' |
    xargs dos2unix




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux