Re: [PATCH 2/2] [GSOC] ref-filter: add %(raw) atom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ZheNing Hu <adlternative@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年6月3日周四 下午1:36写道:
>
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年6月3日周四 上午10:38写道:
> > But I do not think we want to add the new change at this location,
> > at least for two reasons:
> >
> >  * The posted patch checks '!arg' to avoid rejecting "raw:size",
> >    which would not scale at all.  What if you wanted to later add
> >    "raw:upcase", which you must reject?
> >
>
> Yeah, the code here makes "raw" lack of scalability. Especially we
> want to add "%(raw:textconv)" and "%(raw:filter)" later.
>

Now I am building %(raw:textconv) and %(raw:filter), the code will be
very difficult to write:

        if (format->quote_style && !strncmp(sp, "raw", 3)
                                && ((!arg) || (!strncmp(arg,
":textconv", 9)) || (!strncmp(arg, ":filter", 7))))
                return strbuf_addf_ret(err, -1, _("--format=%.*s
cannot be used with"
                                "--python, --shell, --tcl, --perl"),
(int)(ep-atom), atom);

Is there any good way?

Thanks.
--
ZheNing Hu




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux