Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] [GSOC] ref-filter: add %(raw) atom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ZheNing Hu <adlternative@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Doesn't this conflict with your own zh/ref-filter-atom-type topic?
>> Shouldn't one build on top of the other?
>>
>> Or did we find something fundamentally broken about the other topic
>> to make us retract it that I do not remember?
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> I am waiting for zh/ref-filter-atom-type to be merged into master. But it

As you sent this that conflicts with it, clearly you are doing
something else that conflicts with it _without waiting_ ;-).

> hasn't happened yet. But if I want to base the current topic on
> zh/ref-filter-atom-type, GGG will send past patches (zh/ref-filter-atom-type)
> repeatedly.

I thought GGG lets you say "this is based on that other branch, not
on the 'master' branch" to solve that exact issue?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux