Junio C Hamano wrote: > Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > +If you are working on a centralized workflow (pushing to the same repository you > > +pull from, which is typically `origin`), then you need to configure an upstream > > +branch with the same name. > > I suspect it would be simpler to read and easier to understand to > bring the parethesized part front, e.g. > > If you are pushing to the same repository you pull from (which > is typically `origin`), then you need to ... > > as it would avoid "the project is not centralized, but I push to my > own repository and pull from it---what should I do?" questions. The top of `push.default says: Different values are well-suited for specific workflows; for instance, in a purely central workflow (i.e. the fetch source is equal to the push destination), `upstream` is probably what you want. We already brought up the central workflow, I think it's fine to reuse the concept below. -- Felipe Contreras
