Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > The typical case is what git was designed for: distributed remotes. > > It's only the atypical case--fetching and pushing to the same > remote--that we need to keep an eye on. Yup. Avoiding the phrase "centralized" and using "same_remote" makes quite a lot of sense, too. Overall the end-result of the series is quite pleasant read, even though some intermediate states in the middle risked readers to worry about "are we going in the right direction?" Well done.
