Am 30.05.21 um 21:09 schrieb Felipe Contreras:
The current branch is pushed to the corresponding upstream branch, but
as a safety measure, the push is aborted if the upstream branch does not
have the same name as the local one.
Except that isn't accurate.
git clone $url
git checkout -b fix-1
# do commits
git push
Does that push the current branch to the corresponding upstream branch?
I see. Then maybe reword to something like this:
The current branch is pushed to a branch with the same name on the
remote, but as a safety measure, the push is aborted if a corresponding
upstream branch does not have the same name as the local one.
In your above example, I'm in centralized workflow, but I can still push
the fix-1 branch to origin without having to configure an upstream
branch for it. So this seems to contradict with the currently proposed
wording:
If you are working on a centralized workflow, then you need to configure
an upstream branch with the same name.
