Re: Should we do something with #git-devel on Freenode?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Krüger writes:

> If that was all that had happened, I would totally agree. Unfortunately,
> they did quite a bit more than that. They made a script that
> automatically ran the following actions on channels that mentioned
> "libera" in the topic:
>
> * sent a vague message about a ToS violation to the channel;
> * dropped the registration, including the full access list;
> * set the channel to moderated;
> * removed all ops;
> * set an auto-forward to a similarly named topic channel (e.g.
>    #git-devel forwarded to ##git-devel);
> * made no attempt to give control of the topic channel to the previous
>    community, i.e. the new channel would usually end up completely
>    op-less and thus impossible to register at all. If it had been
>    squatted by unrelated people beforehand, it would stay in their
>    control.

Oh wow.  That's crossing a line for me.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux