Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] doc: asciidoc cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> > The "comments-by" sub-thread looked unproductive to me, so I mostly
> > skipped it. ;) But as the person whose name was in the trailer, I will
> > say that I do not care either way if it is included. It did not seem to
> > add anything to me. Some trailers are good for pointing later readers to
> > folks who may be able to help understand or debug an old commit. Some
> > are good for just giving credit to people who helped. "Comments-by"
> > didn't really seem to do either to me (and I don't feel like I
> > contributed much worthy of credit anyway).
> 
> Exactly the same feeling.  It didn't add any value that was why I
> saw no point in using something almost nobody uses (instead of the
> more commonly used Helped-by, for example).

As I demonstrated with probabilistic certainty; everyone uses uncommon
lines (including you). The fact that a line is uncommon doesn't
necessarily mean it's bad, in fact, I do see value in going outside the
box (like one of my favorites: Brown-paper-bag-fixes-by [4981fe750b]).

And of course if you find Comments-by so egregious, you can amend my
commit message (as you have done many times in the past). But this might
be a good opportunity to exercise the advice Jeff gave in another
thread, and even if you are not 100% happy with something, let it slide.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux