Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I think we should go with "raw", because the payloads we discussed here > are unmodified. It is akin to "raw data" that is processed further to > produce porcelain output, such as templating engine that process raw > HTML into HTML pages that would be served to end user. Oh, I can certainly live with --format='%(raw)'; I just view that %(contents:raw) is problematic, especially if we meant to apply it to trees and blobs, because they are not what %(contents) is about. Thanks.
