Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On 22/05/21 05.44, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > In order to minimize the differences in the footer. > > > > Asciidoc automatically generates a date with format '%Y-%m-%d', while > > asciidoctor '%F'. > > > > %F is short yyyy-mm-dd date. AFAIK, it is the same effect as `%Y-%m-%d`. Right, I noticed I was wrong when trying to use -adocdate in asciidoctor. It's actually ignored. The date format probably comes from docbook. The commit message needs to be updated. > > I personally prefer the latter, so only modify it for diff purposes. > > > > Fixes tons of these: > > > > -Git omitted 01/01/1970 GIT-ADD(1) > > +Git omitted 1970-01-01 GIT-ADD(1) > > > > So, the asciidoctor generated date was the bottom one, while the asciidoc > counterpart was the above one, right? Yeap. > The above one, however, was actually %m/%d/%Y. Indeed, the commit message is inaccurate. -- Felipe Contreras
