From: Reuven Y <robi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> The text was somewhat confusing between the revision itself and the autour, improved through a discussion with @Junio Signed-off-by: Reuven Yagel <robi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- typo in glossary content his->this The 't' probably just failed while typing, since we refer here to a branch not a person Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-957%2Frobi-y%2Fmaster-v2 Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-957/robi-y/master-v2 Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/957 Range-diff vs v1: 1: c063a7f9abfd ! 1: 66a3f7e642b6 docs: typo in glossary content @@ Metadata Author: Reuven Y <robi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ## Commit message ## - docs: typo in glossary content + docs: improve fast-forward in glossary content - his->this - The 't' probably just failed while typing, since we refer here to a branch not a person + The text was somewhat confusing between the revision itself and the autour, + improved through a discussion with @Junio Signed-off-by: Reuven Yagel <robi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> @@ Documentation/glossary-content.txt: current branch integrates with) obviously do <<def_branch,branch>>'s changes that happen to be a descendant of what you have. In such a case, you do not make a new <<def_merge,merge>> - <<def_commit,commit>> but instead just update to his -+ <<def_commit,commit>> but instead just update to this - revision. This will happen frequently on a +- revision. This will happen frequently on a ++ <<def_commit,commit>> but instead just update your branch to point at the same ++ revision as the branch you are merging. This will happen frequently on a <<def_remote_tracking_branch,remote-tracking branch>> of a remote <<def_repository,repository>>. + Documentation/glossary-content.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/glossary-content.txt b/Documentation/glossary-content.txt index 67c7a50b96a0..a22cef39fab0 100644 --- a/Documentation/glossary-content.txt +++ b/Documentation/glossary-content.txt @@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ current branch integrates with) obviously do not work, as there is no <<def_revision,revision>> and you are "merging" another <<def_branch,branch>>'s changes that happen to be a descendant of what you have. In such a case, you do not make a new <<def_merge,merge>> - <<def_commit,commit>> but instead just update to his - revision. This will happen frequently on a + <<def_commit,commit>> but instead just update your branch to point at the same + revision as the branch you are merging. This will happen frequently on a <<def_remote_tracking_branch,remote-tracking branch>> of a remote <<def_repository,repository>>. base-commit: bf949ade81106fbda068c1fdb2c6fd1cb1babe7e -- gitgitgadget