Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Here are some patches. The first one adds the tests, and I think is an > obvious improvement. > > The second one does the revert. I'd be quite happy if somebody wants to > figure out how to fix it in a way that addresses the original problem, > and then we can replace that. But in the meantime, I think it makes > sense to prepare the revert, as we wouldn't want to release v2.32.0 with > the bug. I'll queue these directly on top of the original topic, so that even a merge of the branch by mistake down to maint won't break. I saw brian has already floated an idea to solve the original issue, and I'd encourage people to help finding a proper solution, but let's leave the actual application of such a change for the next cycle. Thanks.
