Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] diff-merges: let -m imply -p

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] diff-merges: let -m imply -p
From: Sergey Organov <sorganov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 15:17:38 +0300
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>, Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>, Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx>, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>, Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@xxxxxxxxx>, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <321ca7e8-0ccb-20dd-e2de-2f3c2845e515@gmail.com> (Bagas Sanjaya's message of "Tue, 18 May 2021 10:18:17 +0700")
References: <CAMMLpeR-W35Qq6a343ifrxJ=mwBc_VcXZtVrBYDpJTySNBroFw@mail.gmail.com> <20210517155818.32224-1-sorganov@gmail.com> <321ca7e8-0ccb-20dd-e2de-2f3c2845e515@gmail.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

[...]

>> Exact historical semantics of -m is still provided by
>> --diff-merges=separate.
>> 
>
> Better say "Previously, the -m semantics is same as
> --diff-merges=separate".

Oops, unlike the rest of your suggestions, this one I don't get, sorry.

Thanks,

-- Sergey Organov

References:
- Why doesn't `git log -m` imply `-p`?
  - From: Alex Henrie
- [PATCH v1 0/9] diff-merges: let -m imply -p
  - From: Sergey Organov
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] diff-merges: let -m imply -p
  - From: Bagas Sanjaya

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 2/9] t4013: test "git -m --raw"
Next by Date: Re: Re* [PATCH] doc: glossary: add entry for revision range
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] diff-merges: let -m imply -p
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] diff-merges: let -m imply -p
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]