Re: "bad revision" fetch error when fetching missing objects from partial clones

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18/05/21 15.11, Jeff King wrote:
In practice I think it's an unlikely failure mode for a server you
partial-cloned from to turn off filters, so it's probably not that
important. I hit it because a test script used test_config to enable
them, and then the follow-on test I added to run git-fetch got quite
confused. A more likely scenario is that you might see it a
misconfigured load-balanced pool of servers.

I do wonder how hitting a third-party server should work, though. E.g.,
I partial clone from A, and then ask B to fetch some related history
built on top. Do I tell B that I'm a partial clone and might be missing
some objects? Or do I behave as normal, and expect to fault in objects
that it assumes I have (e.g., a delta base)? And if the latter, does
that work (if it does, then why doesn't the same logic kick in for this
fetch?).


My server is running Gitea (compiled from main branch [1]). The server
itself runs Git 2.31.1. I can also reproduce the issue using Jeff's
test case [2] without Gitea. So this is not Gitea's issue, this is Git's
issue.

Even my server setup is just application server + separate database
server and not load-balanced pool ones.

[1]: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/tree/main
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/YJz4JTsFjTtL7mE2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux