Hi, On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Quoting Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix parallel make problem > > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > >> > So how did this end up in your mail? > > >> > > >> Because it is not a format-patch output. > > >> > > >> I often run "git diff --stat -p HEAD" from inside MUA in order > > >> to get the patch from my work tree, write a proposed commit > > >> message, and then reset the change away without committing after > > >> sending that message (yes I do not need "git stash" --- gmane > > >> and vger are my stashes, Mwhhhaaaa). > > > > > > So maybe we can suppress the warning when the output is not a tty? > > > > What's your point? > > Well, git diff currently says "consider running git-status", and one > wanders why doesn't it just go ahead and run git status instead > of asking the user to do it. I knew why I was opposed to that change. But others shouted louder, I guess. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
