Michal Suchánek wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:47:15AM -0500, Varun Varada wrote: > > So you're saying you're OK with getting rid of all instances of > > "impact"? I'm for this, but insofar as I searched the code base, I > > only found the ones I'm changing in my patch (save for a couple that, > > as a previous reviewer mentioned, are included from other repos, so I > > left those). > > Yes, I am not opposed to the change in principle. Good, so you accept you see nothing wrong with "affect". > You just failed to provide any valid reason. *In your opinion*. In my opinion the problems with the word "impact" have been clearly explained. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras
