Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> "make man" can now be also done with Asciidoctor's manpage backend
> instead of asciidoc+xmlto.
>
> Update INSTALL to reflect that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> This patch is based on "doc: add an option to have Asciidoctor build
> man pages directly" series by brian m. carlson [1]. It can be added
> to that series.
It's not like "can be"; it would not make any sense to queue this
patch before queuing those two patches below it ;-)
Not everybody with Asciidoctor can do the "man" without xmlto; they
must have recent enough vintage of Asciidoctor, or they need xmlto.
The second hunk makes it quite clear, but the updated text in the
first hunk falls a bit short to convey that and needs a bit more
work to clarify, I would think.
> diff --git a/INSTALL b/INSTALL
> index 66389ce059..89e31566c3 100644
> --- a/INSTALL
> +++ b/INSTALL
> @@ -184,8 +184,9 @@ Issues of note:
>
> "make doc" builds documentation in man and html formats; there are
> also "make man", "make html" and "make info". Note that "make html"
> - requires asciidoc, but not xmlto. "make man" (and thus make doc)
> - requires both.
> + requires asciidoc, but not xmlto. "make man" requires either
> + Asciidoctor or asciidoc+xmlto. "make doc" requires both asciidoc
> + and xmlto.
As "make doc" is "make -C Documentaiton all",
"make html" is "make -C Documentaiton html",
"make man" is "make -C Documentaiton man",
and
"make -C Documentation all" is "make -C Documentation html man"
it seems that those who choose to go xmlto-less route for manpages
should not need xmlto while doing "make doc", so the last part of
the updated text is not quite accurate, no?
> @@ -201,6 +202,11 @@ Issues of note:
> use Asciidoctor (requires Ruby) by passing USE_ASCIIDOCTOR=YesPlease
> to make. You need at least Asciidoctor version 1.5.
>
> + You can also do "make man" using Asciidoctor's manpage backend in
> + place of xmlto by passing USE_ASCIIDOCTOR_MANPAGE=YesPlease. Version
> + 2.0 or later is highly recommended, as these version properly handle
> + apostrophes.
> +
Hmph, I wasn't closely following the previous discussion, but is the
apostrophes the primary reason why anything below 2.0 is not usable?
I actually do not mind, for clarity and brevity's sake, to give
readers a bit of white lie and just say something along the lines of
If you use Asciidoctor version 2.0 or later, you can choose to
directly generate manpages with its manpage backend, instaed of
using xmlto in between, by passing USE_ASCIIDOCTOR_MANPAGE=YesPlease
to "make man".
to _require_ 2.0 without even hinting that earlier versions might be
usable.
In any case, thanks for a good start.
