On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 08:08:50PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > Yeah, that was mentioned in the thread I linked earlier. I think it > > would be a fine solution, too. It would probably make sense for it to > > use the shell, as suggested elsewhere, and to call it "smtp-command" for > > consistency with other parts of Git (I'm thinking particularly of > > GIT_SSH versus GIT_SSH_COMMAND, where the latter was introduced to fix > > the defect that the former could not provide any arguments). > > But it would be "smtpserver-command", and I don't think that the best > naming, because it doesn't necessarily have anything to do with SMTP, or > a server. > > I think simply sendemail.command is perfectly fine. Aren't there many other "commands" run by send-email, like --to-cmd and --cc-cmd? It probably should indicate somehow that it is the command for sending mail. I agree it does not have to say "SMTP". If it is meant to be compatible with sendmail, then maybe "sendemail.sendmailCommand" and "--sendmail-cmd" would work. -Peff
