Firmin Martin wrote: > Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > It seems like everyone has written some sort of tooling on top of > > format-patch at this point. Taking a cursory look at your tool, perhaps > > a feature like `--previous-cover-letter <file>` might provide most of > > the functionality that most tooling that I've seen gives. > > This is a good idea. We can default <file> to the target cover letter > (e.g., if -v2 is passed, v2-0000-cover-letter.patch or if > --numbered-files is passed, 0) if present, or the previous series' cover > letter. That's a good idea. Actually I don't see any reason why by default it isn't 0000-v2-cover-letter.patch. If it was it would diminish the need to warn people before overwriting 0000-cover-letter.patch. -- Felipe Contreras
