Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> For testing, wouldn't lib-terminal.sh be usable for your purpose? >> If not, what is the reason why it is insufficient? Can we fix that >> instead? > > That doesn't work, because it insists on reading from /dev/tty and not > the pty that lib-terminal will set up as stdin. But... I somehow thought that lib-terminal was a bit more complete in that it would make the pty we allocate to the controlling terminal for the process that runs the test program. Sigh.
