Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> There is slight overhead in "simulated clone", "simulated partial >> clone", and "clone (partial bitmap)". Unsurprisingly, that overhead is >> due to using the MIDX's reverse index to map between bit positions and >> MIDX positions. > > Thanks - it's great to see that accessing a MIDX bitmap doesn't add much > overhead (as compared to accessing a single-pack bitmap of the same > size). > > All the remaining patches up to and including this one look good. > Overall, I did have some comments here and there, but I am happy with > the overall design. Thanks for a review.
