Sergey Organov <sorganov@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > That said, what do we decide about -m to finally join -c/--cc party and > start to imply -p? Last time we've discussed it, we decided that -m has > been simply overlooked when -c/--cc started to imply -p. Should we > finally fix this? I thought I already said this, but in case I didn't, I think "--diff-merges=separate" should imply "some kind of diff", and not necessarily "-p".
