Re: bug:git-check-ignore exit status is wrong for negative patterns when -v option used

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 
>Jeremy Faith <jeremy.faith@xxxxxxx> writes:

>> git version 2.31.1.362.g311531c9de
>> git-check-ignore 
>> When a negative pattern is the last .gitignore match the -v option causes the exit status to be 0 rather than the expected 1.
>> e.g say .gitignore contains  one line: !hello
>> git check-ignore hello #outputs nothing
>> echo $?  #shows correct exit status=1 i.e None of the provided paths are ignored.
>> but
>> git check-ignore -v hello #output is next line
>> .gitignore:4:!hello   hello
>> echo $?  #shows wrong exit status=0 i.e. One or more of the provided paths is ignored

>Hmph.  This is kind of understandable given the history of the
>command, which was *not* about programatically ask "is this path
>ignored?" question at all.  Instead, it was invented to answer this
>question: I am puzzled by the fact that Git considers this path is
>to be ignored (or "not to be ignored").  Show me which entry in what
>exclude file made the final decision to ignore (or "not to ignore")
>it to help me debug my ignore file(s).

>And the exit code was to signal "yes, I found a relevant entry",
>which made sense for the tool's nature as a debugging aid.

man git-check-ignore states:-
EXIT STATUS
-----------
0::
	One or more of the provided paths is ignored.
1::
	None of the provided paths are ignored.
128::
	A fatal error was encountered.

So my change matches what the manual states.

>So, I suspect that this is working as designed/intended.  I agree
>that it is debatable that the way it was designed to work is a good
>one, though.

I doubt that changing the exit status when -v is added is intended behaviour.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux