Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2021-04-23 22:44:34, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > [...] > > Well, that attempt at working with git upstream went about as bad as I > expected. I was afraid I'd get ignored or worse, get dragged into the > naming debate. > > Seems I got both, amazingly enough. I guess that I'll take that as a > "no, not welcome here" and move on... Do not take my response as representative of the views community. I do believe there's value in your patch, I'm just not personally interested in exploring it. I don't see much value in renaming branches, especially on a distributed SCM where the names are replicated in dozens, potentially thousands of repositories. But that's just me. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras
